Extension to multiple solutions

A simple extension to this algorithm works when the search criterion has

multiple solutions. The oracle then gives an answer “yes” whenever any one

of the M possible solutions is input. The Hilbert space then has a “solution

subspace” M, spanned by M solution states. Let us denote by |βi the uniform

superposition of all these vectors, and by |αi, its orthogonal complement.

|βi =

1

M

X

x∈M

|xi, (8.81)

|αi =

1

N − M

X

x /∈M

|xi. (8.82)

In this situation, the input state is

|ψi =

r

M

N

|βi +

r

N − M

N

|αi. (8.83)

The angle θ is now given by

sin θ = hψ|βi =

r

M

N

. (8.84)

The operator

ˆ

O tags all of the M solutions with a ‘−’ sign, and the Grover

iterate is defined the same way as before. After p iterations we get the state

ˆ

G

p

|ψi = cos[(2p + 1)θ]|αi + sin[(2p + 1)θ]|βi, (8.85)

and the number of iterations required is nearly

p ≈

π

4

r

N

M

. (8.86)

You should check for yourself that this works out.

172 Introduction to Quantum Physics and Information Processing

8.6.2 Quantum counting

A fallout of the multiple search algorithm is the counting algorithm. Be-

fore we know how many times to iterate, we need to know how many solutions

M there are to the search criterion. Can we deduce a quantum algorithm for

finding M given U

f

k

? The solution found by Brassard et al. [15], is a com-

bination of Grover’s search and Shor’s phase estimation algorithms. The key

point here is to note that the number of solutions is related to the eigenvalues

of the operator

ˆ

G, which can also be expressed in the |αi-|βi basis as the 2-d

matrix

ˆ

G =

cos ϕ −sin ϕ

sin ϕ cos ϕ

!

where sin ϕ = 2

p

M(N − M)

N

. (8.87)

The eigenvalues of this matrix are e

±iϕ

. We can therefore use the phase estima-

tion algorithm to deduce ϕ. We need to feed the algorithm with an eigenstate

of

ˆ

G. Now you can see for yourself that |ψi is a linear superposition of the two

eigenstates of

ˆ

G, so the circuit of Figure 8.18 will work to t bits of accuracy.

|0i

H

. . .

QF T

−1

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

t qubits |0i

H

. . .

|0i

H

. . .

|0i

H

ˆ

G

G

2

. . .

G

2

t−1

n + 1 qubits

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

|0i

H

. . .

FIGURE 8.18: Circuit for quantum counting


Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *