{"id":3954,"date":"2024-09-19T12:10:23","date_gmt":"2024-09-19T12:10:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/workhouse.sweetdishy.com\/?p=3954"},"modified":"2024-09-24T09:31:55","modified_gmt":"2024-09-24T09:31:55","slug":"introduction-to-quantum-physics-and-information-processing","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/workhouse.sweetdishy.com\/index.php\/2024\/09\/19\/introduction-to-quantum-physics-and-information-processing\/","title":{"rendered":"Introduction to Quantum Physics and Information Processing"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Introduction to Quantum Physics and Information Processing<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>(a) Experimental setup: 1 slit closed<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>(b) Classically expected result (c) Actual result: interference<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Introduction 9<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>1.2 Properties of Qubits<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Quantum systems have certain properties that are counter-intuitive and<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>completely outside our range of experience in the classical world. These<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cweird\u201d properties are best understood as inevitable consequences of axioms<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>on which quantum laws are based. These axioms have been arrived at af-<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>ter considerable e\ufb00ort and study of experimental phenomena, and are now<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>accepted among physicists as the complete theory which describes the real<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>world at the fundamental level.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The basic mathematical properties of a qubit can be analyzed and studied<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>independent of the physical system that realizes it. By treating the qubit as<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>an abstract mathematical entity, we can develop a general theory of quan-<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>tum information processing. Some of the strange new properties that become<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>relevant are now discussed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Superposition and quantum parallelism: The main implication of<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>states like that of Equation 1.1 is that a single state contains the potential<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>for the system to be in either basis state. In some sense the system, say an<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>electron characterized by its spin value, simultaneously exists in both states<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>until measured. Physically this does not seem to make sense to our classical<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>minds unless we say that the electron has not decided which of the two possible<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>states it should be in, until forced into one of them by a measurement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This feature is exploited in quantum computation to implement what is<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>called quantum parallelism: an operation that acts on a bit can now simul-<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>taneously act on both possible values of the bit if the input is a qubit in a<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>quantum superposition.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Size of computational space: If we want to do an n-bit computation,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Classically the \u201cspace\u201d available for computation is of size n. In terms of a<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>quantum system of n qubits, the number of possible basis states is 2<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>n<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>, and<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>this is the size of the space available for computation. The size of the space of<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>states available for computation grows exponentially with the number of bits<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>(Figure 1.5). This is the power we wish to exploit in quantum computation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Entanglement and quantum correlations: Multiple qubit systems can<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>exist in superposition states that are known as entangled states. These states<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>possess intrinsic correlations between the component systems that are dif-<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>ferent from classical correlations. These correlations can survive even if the<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>component systems are taken physically far apart from each other. For exam-<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>ple, 2-qubit states are in general linear superpositions of |00i, |01i, |10i, and<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>|11i. Look at the state<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>1<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>2<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>(|00i + |11i). In such a state, the \ufb01rst and second<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>systems are correlated quantum mechanically: the value of the second qubit<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>is always equal to that of the \ufb01rst qubit, irrespective of what measurement<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>we make on which bit and when. Such a state is called \u201centangled\u201d because<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>of this correlation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Quantum correlations can be exploited to generate new methods of pro-<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" alt=\"\" src=\"https:\/\/learning.oreilly.com\/api\/v2\/epubs\/urn:orm:book:9781482238129\/files\/bg23.png\" width=\"394\" height=\"265\"><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>10 Introduction to Quantum Physics and Information Processing<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>FIGURE 1.5: Computational power: quantum vs classical.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>cessing, increasing the e\ufb03ciency by allowing controlled operations to be per-<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>formed. These correlations are an invaluable resource in quantum information<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>theory and we will see their basic applications in quantum state teleportation<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>and secure information transfer over a distance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Measurement and state collapse: Though a qubit could exist in a su-<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>perposition of basis states, a measurement of the qubit would give one of the<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>two basis states alone. Measurement of a quantum system causes it to collapse<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>into one of the basis states, which destroys the superposition, including any<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>information that may be encoded in the probability amplitudes. Some au-<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>thors express this property as a qubit existing in a superposition not having<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>a de\ufb01nite state. Measurement results can be predicted with 100% certainty in<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cde\ufb01nite\u201d states, and the system exists in a basis state. When a system is not<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>in a de\ufb01nite state, measurement disturbs the system and one can never know<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>the original state exactly. It is a quantitative and in-depth study of quantum<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>measurements that has uncovered new laws of quantum information.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Unitary evolution and reversibility: Quantum dynamical laws gov-<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>erning the evolution of an isolated quantum system are what are known as<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>unitary evolutions. Thus the functioning of a quantum computer is necessarily<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>via unitary transformations of the initial quantum state. Unitary operations<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>are fully reversible and, from a large body of study on the energetics of com-<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>putation, are said to lead to greater energy e\ufb03ciency.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>No cloning: This is another peculiar property of generic quantum states:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>quantum states that are not basis states cannot be perfectly cloned or copied.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The fact that classical states can be copied and kept aside for further process-<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>ing is often taken for granted. When implementing a function in a classical<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>circuit, we often send copies of a particular input to di\ufb00erent parts of the<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>circuit. Such an operation is no longer possible in quantum computing. This<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>changes the way we look at a quantum computation. And on the upside,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>this also makes it possible to exchange information in a secure manner since<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>tapping a quantum line disturbs the system irrevocably!<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Introduction 11<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>These properties lead us naturally to a model of computation often called<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>the \u201ccircuit model,\u201d based on classical logic-gate circuits, of quantum compu-<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>tation, which is what we will primarily study in this book. However, several<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>other models of quantum information processing have also evolved, such as<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>measurement-based computation, continuous-variable computation and adia-<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>batic evolution. The interested reader may refer to the literature for these.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>1.3 Practical Considerations<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Theoretically, the examination of the paradigm of quantum computation<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>has been very promising and exciting. However these considerations need to be<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>grounded in reality. Pure quantum systems are found at the microscopic scale<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>and are di\ufb03cult to access except by special technological means. To initialize<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>any information process, we must have the means to assign any desired state<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>to the qubit. Manipulation of the states of an individual qubit requires a high<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>level of technological ingenuity. We need not just one qubit but large qubit<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>registers. These may be built out of a collection of non-interacting qubits but<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>whether such a register can be built for the system at hand brings in questions<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>of scalability.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In implementing a quantum gate, we would be required to assemble some<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>means to applying forces on the system in a precise and accurate manner.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>These operations would have to be impervious to error. The major prob-<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>lem in practice with quantum superposition states is that they are extremely<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>fragile. The slightest interactions would cause a disturbance by which the co-<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>herence is lost and the prepared system ends up in one of the basis states!<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This phenomenon, known in literature as decoherence, is also crucial in un-<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>derstanding how the classical world emerges from the quantum substrate.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>However, the discovery of quantum error correction and the subsequent con-<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>struction of fault-tolerant computing has infused con\ufb01dence in the success of<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>the paradigm despite this issue.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The \ufb01nal big challenge is in interpreting the results of a measurement on<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>the system. The whole computational process must be set up such that the<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>end result is one of the basis states so that measurements give de\ufb01nite and<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>not probabilistic outcomes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>It may indeed be justi\ufb01able to ask if quantum computation is just in theory,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>a matter of fanciful speculation, or possible in concrete implementation. While<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>there are technical challenges in the building of a feasible quantum computer,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>the actual implementation is not only possible but also a reality. Various<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>ingenious techniques in quantum physics have been implemented, and newer<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>ones are being rapidly developed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In developing a viable physical implementation, a bunch of criteria, \ufb01rst<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>to be underlined by DiVincenzo [30], are to be satis\ufb01ed:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>12 Introduction to Quantum Physics and Information Processing<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>1. A robust, error-tolerant system for qubits<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>2. A method of initializing (preparing initial states)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>3. Scalability: quantum systems that must be replicated to larger numbers<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>to make bigger registers<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>4. Ability to manipulate individual quantum states: this is the most chal-<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>lenging engineering task that is required to make the computer work<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>5. Readout of output: the end result of the computation must be readable,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>that is, measurement with unambiguous results.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Several systems have been analyzed with these criteria in mind. In a given<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>system too, there could be di\ufb00erent possible realizations of a qubit. In Ta-<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>ble 1.1, we list a few such systems to give you an idea of the variety in the<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>physics that is involved.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>TABLE 1.1: Summary of common physical implementations of quantum com-<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>puting systems.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>System Information carrier Method of control<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Quantum Optics photon polarization polarizers, half wave<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>plates, quarter wave<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>plates<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>presence of a single photon<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>in one of two modes<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>beamsplitters, mirrors,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>and non-linear optical<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>media<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Cavity QED two-level atom interacting<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>with a single photon<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>phase-shifters, beam split-<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>ters, and other linear opti-<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>cal elements<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Trapped Ions hyper\ufb01ne energy levels<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>and the vibrational modes<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>of the atom<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>pulsed laser light to ma-<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>nipulate the atomic state<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Nuclear Magnetic<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Resonance (NMR)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>nuclear spin states pulsed RF \ufb01elds in the<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>presence of a strong exter-<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>nal magnetic \ufb01eld<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Superconducting<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Circuits<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Cooper-pair box electrostatic gates and<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Josephson junctions<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\ufb02ux-coupled SQUID magnetic \ufb01elds, spin inter-<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>actions<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>current-biased junction pulsed microwave \ufb01elds<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Quantum Dots electron spin magnetic \ufb01elds and volt-<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>age pulses<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>charge state electrostatic gates and<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Introduction to Quantum Physics and Information Processing (a) Experimental setup: 1 slit closed (b) Classically expected result (c) Actual result: interference Introduction 9 1.2 Properties of Qubits Quantum systems have certain properties that are counter-intuitive and completely outside our range of experience in the classical world. These \u201cweird\u201d properties are best understood as inevitable consequences [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":3939,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[486],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3954","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-1-introduction"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/workhouse.sweetdishy.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/quantum-computing.png","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/workhouse.sweetdishy.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3954","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/workhouse.sweetdishy.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/workhouse.sweetdishy.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/workhouse.sweetdishy.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/workhouse.sweetdishy.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3954"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/workhouse.sweetdishy.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3954\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4550,"href":"https:\/\/workhouse.sweetdishy.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3954\/revisions\/4550"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/workhouse.sweetdishy.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3939"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/workhouse.sweetdishy.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3954"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/workhouse.sweetdishy.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3954"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/workhouse.sweetdishy.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3954"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}